This morning, I have woken up with intense anger, so much so that white hot fire is coursing through My veins. Thank goodness today is My day off - otherwise some poor maggot would be feeling the force of this anger!
Having read the full run-down of the new "Porn Nazi" laws, I am disgusted that because I choose to enjoy the BDSM lifestyle, I am now a criminal. Because I have a vagina and breasts - that also makes Me a criminal.
These new porn laws are downright discriminatory. We are supposed to live in the age of equality, where women should have the same power as men - bollocks! We are nowhere near that! Clearly, we are now back to a time where women should be seen and not heard.
So let's take a deeper look into these laws:
The consumption of female ejaculate is not allowed - the consumption of male ejaculate IS allowed.
Right, so it's okay for a women to be gang-banged roughly, face-fucked until she gags, and then have several men ejaculate in her mouth at once - this is seen as perfectly fine. It doesn't damage children at all....
Yet it's not okay for one woman to sit on a man's face and squirt into his mouth...that apparently DOES damage children.
Spanking, caning, whipping, penetration of any object and verbal abuse are not allowed - whether or not such acts are consensual .
So if you enjoy being spanked - sorry folks - that's no longer allowed. If you enjoy being called a "disgusting fuck pig" - that isn't allowed either.
However, if you're a woman, you are perfectly fine to be dressed as schoolgirl - roughly passed around like a piece of meat, have every orifice stuffed with cock - because THAT doesn't damage children...apparently.
Oh, and the law states that such material shouldn't look like they are "TV-like". I'm sorry, but I can't remember the last time I saw a man being pegged, before it cut to the News at Ten followed by the weather forecast. Is there a clip out there of a women masturbating before it cuts to the latest deals from Sky TV? Hello?
Let's cut to the chase here. These laws are ridiculous, unworkable, discriminatory, archaic and complete and utter tosh. As somebody has clearly pointed out; 50 shades of Grey is due out in the cinemas soon. Women (and men!) around the world have read the 50 Shades of Grey series - excuse Me - it's full of BDSM! Is E L James now a criminal? But then again, the Dominant subject in the series is a man - so I guess that's okay as far as MPs are concerned.
These laws have been made on the pretext that they are to protect children from abuse. Child abuse is NOT pornography. "Child porn" is NOT pornography - it is evidence of a crime! Sexual acts between two consenting adults IS pornography - but is NOT crime - except if you're an MP that is.
Adults who enjoy a healthy, colourful and kinky sex life are not criminals. We are not deviants who at one whiff of BDSM will suddenly be overcome with an urge to harm children.
If MPs really want to protect children then do something about the many paedophile rings, many of which are right under their own noses; they seemingly want to pretend don't exist.
But then again, what can you expect from people who once wanted to the age of consent to be lowered to 13?
Well dear readers, it is time to make a stand - for our right to express ourselves sexually and enjoy our kinks without fear of reprisals.
If you believe these laws are unjust and unfair, then I urge you to take a moment to sign the petition via the link below - and tell David Cameron that we will NOT be treated as criminals because our sexual tastes are not considered to be "the norm". This is not just about the Adult Industry - it's about your RIGHT to enjoy safe, sane and CONSENSUAL play, without out of touch idiots telling you what is and isn't good for you.
https://www.change.org/p/david-cameron-mp-remove-regulations-for-video-on-demand-pornography-amsr-2014?recruiter=46207231&utm_source=share_petition&utm_medium=facebook&utm_campaign=autopublish&utm_term=des-lg-share_petition-no_msg
Having read the full run-down of the new "Porn Nazi" laws, I am disgusted that because I choose to enjoy the BDSM lifestyle, I am now a criminal. Because I have a vagina and breasts - that also makes Me a criminal.
These new porn laws are downright discriminatory. We are supposed to live in the age of equality, where women should have the same power as men - bollocks! We are nowhere near that! Clearly, we are now back to a time where women should be seen and not heard.
So let's take a deeper look into these laws:
The consumption of female ejaculate is not allowed - the consumption of male ejaculate IS allowed.
Right, so it's okay for a women to be gang-banged roughly, face-fucked until she gags, and then have several men ejaculate in her mouth at once - this is seen as perfectly fine. It doesn't damage children at all....
Yet it's not okay for one woman to sit on a man's face and squirt into his mouth...that apparently DOES damage children.
Spanking, caning, whipping, penetration of any object and verbal abuse are not allowed - whether or not such acts are consensual .
So if you enjoy being spanked - sorry folks - that's no longer allowed. If you enjoy being called a "disgusting fuck pig" - that isn't allowed either.
However, if you're a woman, you are perfectly fine to be dressed as schoolgirl - roughly passed around like a piece of meat, have every orifice stuffed with cock - because THAT doesn't damage children...apparently.
Oh, and the law states that such material shouldn't look like they are "TV-like". I'm sorry, but I can't remember the last time I saw a man being pegged, before it cut to the News at Ten followed by the weather forecast. Is there a clip out there of a women masturbating before it cuts to the latest deals from Sky TV? Hello?
Let's cut to the chase here. These laws are ridiculous, unworkable, discriminatory, archaic and complete and utter tosh. As somebody has clearly pointed out; 50 shades of Grey is due out in the cinemas soon. Women (and men!) around the world have read the 50 Shades of Grey series - excuse Me - it's full of BDSM! Is E L James now a criminal? But then again, the Dominant subject in the series is a man - so I guess that's okay as far as MPs are concerned.
These laws have been made on the pretext that they are to protect children from abuse. Child abuse is NOT pornography. "Child porn" is NOT pornography - it is evidence of a crime! Sexual acts between two consenting adults IS pornography - but is NOT crime - except if you're an MP that is.
Adults who enjoy a healthy, colourful and kinky sex life are not criminals. We are not deviants who at one whiff of BDSM will suddenly be overcome with an urge to harm children.
If MPs really want to protect children then do something about the many paedophile rings, many of which are right under their own noses; they seemingly want to pretend don't exist.
But then again, what can you expect from people who once wanted to the age of consent to be lowered to 13?
Well dear readers, it is time to make a stand - for our right to express ourselves sexually and enjoy our kinks without fear of reprisals.
If you believe these laws are unjust and unfair, then I urge you to take a moment to sign the petition via the link below - and tell David Cameron that we will NOT be treated as criminals because our sexual tastes are not considered to be "the norm". This is not just about the Adult Industry - it's about your RIGHT to enjoy safe, sane and CONSENSUAL play, without out of touch idiots telling you what is and isn't good for you.
https://www.change.org/p/david-cameron-mp-remove-regulations-for-video-on-demand-pornography-amsr-2014?recruiter=46207231&utm_source=share_petition&utm_medium=facebook&utm_campaign=autopublish&utm_term=des-lg-share_petition-no_msg
No comments:
Post a Comment